There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| The Atheist's Guide To|
|More about atheism|
Absurdism is an atheistic stance on the meaning of life, behind the disambiguation of "atheist existentialism" and nihilism. In the broadest sense, absurdists take the stance that the search for the meaning of life is futile, either because it is unknowable to humans or that it doesn't exist. The philosophy was popularised by French novelist Albert Camus in the 1950s.
There are three ways to solve the problem of meaningless (assuming that it is a problem). The first is suicide, which is considered to not solve the problem by Camus and Søren Kierkegaard because the act of ending one's existence is also absurd. The second is religion; considered by Camus to be "philosophical suicide" due to the acceptance of bullshit. The third is acceptance of the absurd: to accept that one's existence is likely meaningless, but to continue living in the face of it — the ultimate act of rebellion. This has been historically likened to the British saying "carry on".
Absurdism is an underdeveloped philosophy and thus is relativistic in nature. The core idea is vague, and the corollary of this is that the absurd means different things to different people. One major divide is the question of whether absurdism states for certain that there is no meaning, or whether it is just suggested that there is no reason to think there is meaning. Another is whether one can formulate their own meaning, whilst accepting it to be personal and absurd, and another of whether belief in a god is contradictory to the philosophy.