There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Consciousness of guilt
| You betrayed the|
Consciousness of guilt is a legal concept and a type of circumstantial evidence of guilt. It is based on a criminal suspect who demonstrates a guilty conscience by their actions or speech. Some examples of consciousness of guilt are:
- Fleeing from the crime scene or jurisdiction
- False statements and lies
- False alibi
- Changing one's name or personal appearance
- Concealing or destroying evidence
- Witness intimidation or bribery
- Generally, any attempts to cover up a crime
Simply put, consciousness of guilt is an action or statement that a person accused of a crime makes that an innocent person would not make.
Consciousness of guilt can be misinterpreted, either by way of innocent explanation (e.g., "I was running to get away from the riot, not because I partook in it.") or from the problems of hearsay evidence.
In the United States some behaviors of a defendant are automatically not considered consciousness of guilt, including denial of committing a crime and silence, the latter of which is protected by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and the Supreme Court decision that resulted in the Miranda warning.
- Consciousness of Guilt Stephen G. Rodriguez & Partners
- Guilt and the Consciousness of Guilt: The Use of Lies, Flight, and other 'Guilty Behaviour' in the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime by Andrew Palmer (1997) Melbourne University Law Review 21:95-149.