Perjury

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
In the name of the
Law
Icon law.svg
To punish
and protect

Perjury is willfully lying under oath, usually in a court of law, but also under certain other specific circumstances, such as testifying before Congress (in the US).

The favorite way to avoid perjury in modern times, perfected by Ronald Reagan under the sad influences of "plausible deniability" and Alzheimer's Disease, is to claim to "have no memory".[1]

Famously, of course, William Jefferson Clinton was caught covering his own ass in a gentleman's white lie regarding the honor of a young lady wherein he stated "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" while being interrogated about other matters (though this was in a press conference, not under oath). As for the actual legal testimony, we at the site will officially call it perjury, even if not actually the case.[2] Fifty million dollars later, it was proved that he had, indeed, interfered with said woman's honor. So he was impeached Congress initiated impeachment proceedings against him and later he was acquitted of all charges.

Indictments for perjury are often paired with "obstruction of justice," at least in the US, since the process of lying under oath almost by definition obstructs the course of justice in a case.

Historically[edit]

In the Middle Ages, oaths were taken on relics. Thus, perjury was both a religious and a secular transgression, which usually carried the double penalty of excommunication and forfeiture of legal rights. This in turn meant that the perjurer would be unable to take oaths in future court trials, being instead forced to defend himself through the ordeal, single combat or similarly less-optimal means. Unless, of course, a saint descended from the heavens and smote the perjurer dead upon the spot with righteous fury. That happened only rarely, however, and was known as Argumentum e silentium.[note 1]

In ancient Judaic law (Halakha), it was punished by inflicting upon the perjurer the same punishment as he had meant to cause against someone else through the perjury.[3]

Variations on a theme[edit]

In the United States, perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) is not the only form of lying that is criminal.

  • Perjury not only requires lying under oath, but it require that the lie was a material misstatement and that it was willful (that the person knowingly lied when they said the lie).[4] For these reasons, perjury is extremely difficult to prove,[4] and prosecutors will often try to prosecute other charges instead.
  • Making "false statements" (18 U.S.C. § 1001) is "knowingly and willfully… [making] any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation… [regarding] any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch."[4][5] It is not required that the statement be under oath, and the law has a broad sweep.[4]
  • Other parts of US Code can also involve lies, including obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1505 and 18 U.S.C. § 1515(b)).[4]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. No, this is not a fallacy.

References[edit]

  1. Reagan Hazy On Iran-contra: Knowledge Of Diversion Is Denied by Janet Cawley & Linda P. Campbell (February 23, 1990) Chicago Tribune.
  2. [1]
  3. Deuteronomy 19:18-19
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 The Law of Lying: Perjury, False Statements, and Obstruction by Helen Klein Murillo (March 22, 2017, 9:30 AM) Lawfare.
  5. 18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally