Draft talk:Red herrings in CUP genocide denialism
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
We've already got a Armenian Genocide denial page and it's not big enough to warrant an oddly named sub-page. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 17:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- I though this was about Cambridge University Press. Spud (talk) 17:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- It'd be a bit like if our article on Holodomor was titled "CPC genocide denial" in reference to the Council of People's Commisars, rather than like... the USSR? There's some relevant choices in their history, but it's way too fucking specific. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 17:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decent points. Should I merge the content into a section on that page? — Unsigned, by: Summa Atheologica / talk / contribs
- That's for sure my recommendation. This article title sounds like a great section title, though. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 15:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Will it be acceptable if I now delete this fragment of a draft?Summa Atheologica (talk) 16:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- You got a mop because we trust you. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 16:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Will it be acceptable if I now delete this fragment of a draft?Summa Atheologica (talk) 16:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- That's for sure my recommendation. This article title sounds like a great section title, though. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 15:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Decent points. Should I merge the content into a section on that page? — Unsigned, by: Summa Atheologica / talk / contribs
- It'd be a bit like if our article on Holodomor was titled "CPC genocide denial" in reference to the Council of People's Commisars, rather than like... the USSR? There's some relevant choices in their history, but it's way too fucking specific. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 17:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)