Essay talk:Common criticisms of RationalWiki

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Essay:Why RationalWiki is so great and Essay:Why RationalWiki is not so great are pretty stubby. Would it make sense to merge them in? FᴜᴢᴢʏCᴀᴛPᴏᴛᴀᴛᴏ, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 21:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)


I've even heard of college professors discounting wikis because "anyone can contribute to it". They fail to realize that you can ... uh... check the sources, which most news outlets lack... Is there an article that covers this?—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 15:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Sadly, I do not think so.--Deli-delibirda! (talk) 10:22, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Criticism of the "It's biased" section[edit]

Just because RationalWiki has categories reflecting criticism of a wide variety of ideologies doesn't mean that the coverage of all of those ideologies is necessarily going to be equal. It's like "Plessy v. Ferguson"- just because two categories exist and are supposedly "separate but equal" doesn't mean they are of the same quality. (talk) 18:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Wait, did OP (sorry for using reddit lingo) just say this is Liberal Conservapedia?[edit]

If it is then, maybe I should be more open minded about conservapedia.Halforc (talk) 01:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)