|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Essay talk:Elvis is King: A Complete Anthology
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jack Chick.[edit]
Are we sure that Jack Chick is dead? Because EiK's stuff reads like Chick Tracts minus the cartoons. Comrade GC (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think you have a point. I would've included that essay with the rabid anti-Catholicism, but it was deleted from the site due to potentially libelous claims like the Pope being a "pedo lover." --Taylor Swift lover (talk) 02:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- I honestly didn't want to have to deal with a City-State being pissed at us so I deleted it, though if it wasn't for that one potentially libelous remark I would have let it stay. On a side note @Colonel Sanders would you be willing to help write a joint essay comparing EiK's work with that of Jack Chick? It would likely prove quite entertaining. Comrade GC (talk) 02:55, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Completely understandable. I was just pointing that one out because that rabid anti-Catholicism was quite Jack Chick-esque. Perhaps it could be incorporated minus that one remark. I would also be quite open to such a collab essay. Although EiK seems more concerned about bringing me to the Lord at this point. --Taylor Swift lover (talk) 03:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm... correct me if I'm wrong but aren't RW essays are covered by a copyright waver? Meaning we (you and I) could write an essay in response to and/or citing EiK's work without having to bring him in on the project. Comrade GC (talk) 03:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- According to the CC BY-SA 3.0 license all RW essays are under, we can cite/quote his content with attribution under any circumstances. It shouldn't be a problem, especially since it's all under the same license anyway. His website is also under the same license should we choose to cite it. --Taylor Swift lover (talk) 03:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm... correct me if I'm wrong but aren't RW essays are covered by a copyright waver? Meaning we (you and I) could write an essay in response to and/or citing EiK's work without having to bring him in on the project. Comrade GC (talk) 03:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Completely understandable. I was just pointing that one out because that rabid anti-Catholicism was quite Jack Chick-esque. Perhaps it could be incorporated minus that one remark. I would also be quite open to such a collab essay. Although EiK seems more concerned about bringing me to the Lord at this point. --Taylor Swift lover (talk) 03:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- I honestly didn't want to have to deal with a City-State being pissed at us so I deleted it, though if it wasn't for that one potentially libelous remark I would have let it stay. On a side note @Colonel Sanders would you be willing to help write a joint essay comparing EiK's work with that of Jack Chick? It would likely prove quite entertaining. Comrade GC (talk) 02:55, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Poe's Law[edit]
—ClickerClock (talk) 04:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm 75% sure he's a parodist, but he would have to be extremely dedicated. Spriggina (xerrada) (contribucions) @ 04:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- There are too many people on the interwebs without anything better to do. —ClickerClock (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2018 (UTC)