Forum:Conservapedia in bullet points

< Index | Conservapedia discussion

Question

If you had to enumerate your gripes against Conservapedia or its sysops in bullet points of 10 words or less, what would you say? ListenerX^TalkerX 05:30, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Responses

ListenerX

The Conservapedians:

• Invariably pull the banhammer upon losing a debate
• Groundlessly impugn the honor of scientists
• Conflate liberalism and communism
• Propound every logical fallacy known to man
• Are like unto whited sepulchres

TheoryOfPractice

• No gripes. They are mean-spirited idiots, but they are of no real import beyond their marginal website.

BON

• Conservapedia is simply one man's quest to manufacture his own variant of reality ^{— Unsigned, by: 194.6.79.200 / talk / contribs}

TheEgyptian

• The Banhammer - Conservapedia's answer to Godwin's Law
• To disagree with Andy/TK is to embody eb1l librulism.
• TK is an asshole. Discuss.
• TK is a parodist. Discuss.
• TK is both the above. Discuss.
• CP Logic: Banning user = I PWND UR ARGUMENT LOL!

-- 16:04, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Armondikov

While I do really like the BON's above, I'll go for something of my own.

• Not an actual encyclopaedia.
• Mostly hypocritical with respect to freedom and censorship.
• A good idea marred by the paranoia of its owner and lead author.

Doggedpersistence

• Teaching lies and hate to children and claiming it's 'Education'.

Toast

Crap Obtuse Nonsense Supplanting Everything Real Vith^[sic] Arse Poop - End (dia). ^yummy &  ^honey_{(or marmalade)} (sorry the imagination's not working this AM) 11:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

NickHeer

• The bending or ignorance of fact to fit a preconceived story.

Auld Nick

• Conservapedia: A celebration of ignorance.

Thunderstruck

• You can't spell "Conservapedia" without "CON"

David Gerard

• None really. They are of no importance whatsoever and all their traffic comes via RationalWiki - David Gerard (talk) 09:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Slugboy

• Conservapedia: no liberal bias allowed, full of conservative bias
• anything can be disproven with a source or a fake statistic

Slugboy (talk) 12:59, 19 May 2010 (UTC)