Forum:Does this site have a liberal bias?

< Index | General discussion

I'm seeing on here a lot of trash talk against conservatives here, and want to know if most of these people on here liberal. (BillyMLGquickscoper) (talk) 15:33, 14 February 2016‎ (UTC)

Perhaps you should read the page like Stalin apologetics and then decide for yourself whether this site has a liberal bias? Bongolian (talk) 01:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Don't you just love these drive-by posts? Of course we have a liberal bias, but that's just my opinion. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 05:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

I thought it was a rational bias. Read-Write (talk) 05:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

This site is "rational", in the same way that Fox News is "fair & balanced". (((Zack Martin)))^™ 20:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Actually, having thought about it more, the articles are pretty much biased against everyone. Heard someone speak on the radio? Write a hit-piece about her on RationalWiki! Someone forward you an email about a book coming out? Write a hit-piece about it on RationalWiki! Read-Write (talk) 00:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Put another way, everyone to my right is a wingnut. Everyone to my left is a moonbat. Read-Write (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

“Reality has a well-known liberal bias." - Stephen Colbert 81.145.153.190 (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

I guess I don't see how pointing out people doing bad things is a "liberal bias" if they are conservatives. If people do bad shit it's on them. It's more biased to protect people of the "in" group, no matter what they have done, than going after people who do bad things. People do bad things...welcome to life. It's much worse to protect them because they are "one of us". -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

The article Slavery seems pretty fair-minded. "Slavery is an excellent example of a social institution". Annquin (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)