Fun talk:Aestheistic

Awesome. tmtoulouse ^heckle 16:09, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

I created a word. Freakin' sweet. Thunderkatz^Ho! 16:23, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

Suggested alternative definitions?

Aetheistic Creating beautiful objects de art but denying they exist.

CЯacke® 16:25, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

Or believing in a god who cares only about fashion and interior design. Thunderkatz^Ho! 16:27, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

A gay god? Hmmmm, interesting.CЯacke® 16:29, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

Who says the god's a man? Thunderkatz^Ho! 16:30, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

She isn't, so far as I know.CЯacke® 16:31, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

Thy wills be done. human^{be in} 19:31, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

namespace afterthought

This, uh, should have been in ACD:, not the mainspace, what say we? (and it should be recipro-linked with the talk page on which it was coined, credit where credit is due and all that suchfly bites. Godspeed! human^{be in} 21:41, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

Spelling

Aestheistic, or aetheistic? Cuz the page has both. I think the original usage was aethist/aetheistic/aetheism. Thunderkatz^Ho! 11:46, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

See: Aetheistic.--PalMD^{-Oy, mein tukhas!} 11:56, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

Yes, but the original use here is aetheism without the "s". And this page uses both spellings; it is titled with the "s", and uses the spelling without the "s" in the actual text. Thunderkatz^Ho! 12:00, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

I think the uses on this page are meant to be humorous, as in the "denying they exist" thing.--PalMD^{-Oy, mein tukhas!} 12:04, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

I know, I'm simply saying that spelling on this page should be consistent. Thunderkatz^Ho! 12:05, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

Since I was not part of the creating, and don't quite get it anyway, i have no opinion.--PalMD^{-Oy, mein tukhas!} 12:07, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

Agreed, spelling should be consistent. The title is a correct transcription of the original blypo, which has been lost in the mists of wiki-time. human^{be in} 22:22, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

Move to funspace?

Given that the entire subject of the article has been made up, I feel that this article belongs in the funspace, rather than the mainspace. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:27, 9 February 2009 (EST)

How come I've been hanging round here for two years and never came across this beauty? Totnesmartin (talk) 17:40, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

I know, I've just seen it on RC. But I reckon we can keep it in mainspace. Afterall, the article doesn't say anything about when this term and the various definitions were coined or who by. ^postate 18:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

+1 Move to fun. Mei III (talk) 02:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

+2 Тy^Talk. 02:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

+7 Chthonios (talk) 02:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC)