Fun talk:Citizendium FAQ

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon internet.svg

This Internet related article has been awarded SILVER status for quality. We like it, and you should too! See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


Best of Amusement[edit]

I here humbly nominate this FAQ for Best of amusement. Why?

  • It's accurate: It concisely represents every single reason for the total failure that is CZ.
  • It works really well as a critique: And it is not subtle about it at all.
  • It's funny. Of course, above all.
  • Wheee! Paragraph labelling is fun.

Any objections? --Ray's Super Fun Hellhole! g͘͡r̸̀a̸̶̡n̶̶͜ţ̡ ̀҉̴̨͡m̀͘͜͢e͡ ̸͟҉̷̢ỳ̸̡̀͞ơ̡̢̡ų̧r̴̀͡͝ ̡҉҉̧̛s̵̕͏̡ǫ̀́͢ų́l̵̕҉ 20:58, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey, why not. A bit inside-baseball, but hey - David Gerard (talk) 10:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Go for it. I love this page. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 10:18, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
BoA'd. --Ray's Super Fun Hellhole! g͘͡r̸̀a̸̶̡n̶̶͜ţ̡ ̀҉̴̨͡m̀͘͜͢e͡ ̸͟҉̷̢ỳ̸̡̀͞ơ̡̢̡ų̧r̴̀͡͝ ̡҉҉̧̛s̵̕͏̡ǫ̀́͢ų́l̵̕҉ 20:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

The justification and prospects of the project § Are you against pseudonymity or anonymity in general?[edit]

I couldn't think of anything witty to put there (it comes after "Why make a special role for experts?"). Someone else have something to put there? —Kazitor, pending 06:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC)