There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Fun talk:MMORPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bastid, now I didn't create it!!! </Ed Poor> Sorry for the mispelling. Did you fix the incoming link(s)? ħuman 04:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually it still counts as you having created it even after a move. This is why Ed has 1,000 articles because a lot were moved from Ed Brain Droppings names to sensible encyclopaedic names. - π 04:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Really? I thought that when one moved some tripe, one got credit (as in the massive move from ACD to "fun", befoer we had bots?). In the end, of course, I don't care, 'cause I ain't Ed. Or at least, I hope I'm not. ħuman
04:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Really? I thought that when one moved some tripe, one got credit (as in the massive move from ACD to "fun", befoer we had bots?). In the end, of course, I don't care, 'cause I ain't Ed. Or at least, I hope I'm not. ħuman
While I don't mean to trod on a article of Human's...[edit]
...what the hell is the point of this? Tetronian you're clueless 19:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- There isn't one. Vaping... Professor Moriarty 20:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- 'Twas about the fine art of sockpuppetry, as I recall. ħuman
20:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- 'Twas. But it was a stub a la Ed Poor. Tetronian you're clueless 20:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- No, 'twasn't. I'm not surely I really agree with this deletion. Some discussion first might have been a good idea. ħuman
22:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- No, 'twasn't. I'm not surely I really agree with this deletion. Some discussion first might have been a good idea. ħuman
- 'Twas. But it was a stub a la Ed Poor. Tetronian you're clueless 20:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- 'Twas about the fine art of sockpuppetry, as I recall. ħuman
How is this article on mission?[edit]
Civic Cat (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- It isn't. Blue (is useful) 23:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Fun?--BobSpring is sprung! 23:54, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. (Funspace == RW garbage dump) Blue (is useful) 03:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Fun?--BobSpring is sprung! 23:54, 6 January 2011 (UTC)