Fun talk:MMORPG

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Bastid, now I didn't create it!!! </Ed Poor> Sorry for the mispelling. Did you fix the incoming link(s)? ħumanUser talk:Human 04:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually it still counts as you having created it even after a move. This is why Ed has 1,000 articles because a lot were moved from Ed Brain Droppings names to sensible encyclopaedic names. - π 04:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Really? I thought that when one moved some tripe, one got credit (as in the massive move from ACD to "fun", befoer we had bots?). In the end, of course, I don't care, 'cause I ain't Ed. Or at least, I hope I'm not. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

While I don't mean to trod on a article of Human's...[edit]

...what the hell is the point of this? Tetronian you're clueless 19:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

There isn't one. Vaping... Professor Moriarty 20:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
'Twas about the fine art of sockpuppetry, as I recall. ħumanUser talk:Human 20:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
'Twas. But it was a stub a la Ed Poor. Tetronian you're clueless 20:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
No, 'twasn't. I'm not surely I really agree with this deletion. Some discussion first might have been a good idea. ħumanUser talk:Human 22:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


How is this article on mission?[edit]

Civic Cat (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

It isn't. Blue Talk 23:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Fun?--BobSpring is sprung! 23:54, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Yes. (Funspace == RW garbage dump) Blue Talk 03:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
I think this article should stay in funspace. As I have said before, there is a difference between a mere snarky, humorous article and a surrealistic Onion or Uncyclopedia-style article. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 03:04, 14 May 2012 (UTC)