Information icon.svg Nominations and campaigning for the RationalWiki 2019 Moderator Election is underway and will end on November 16.

Fun talk:Orgasm

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Myths[edit]

"Some people" talk about the myth of the vaginal orgasm. RationalWiki, by mission, is dedicated to refuting myths and claims of pseudoscience. Should this be discussed on this page? -- Seth Peck (talk) 21:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

It is not so much a myth, as "non scientific". Nothing has shown science has found the g-spot or "vaginal ogasmas" despite all the women's Rag whoopla about it. I'm betting, a climax is a climax, but what do I know, I just have them - I don't study them.  ;-) Pink mowse.pngGodotI live in the Infinite monkey cage 21:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Well, non-scientific theories are also targetted by this site....but I would say that the concept is not non-refutable, given that there is evidence that it exists... -- Seth Peck (talk) 22:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Here you go, Godot: [1] -- Seth Peck (talk) 22:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
oh, i wasn't suggesting we shoudln't do it! just that it's more "non science" than myth - just definitions on my part. To be honest, I laugh at most of the research purporting to be about women's climaxes. In no small measure cause it's pretty unusual for a women to be able to get off with cameras and lights, and monitors. So I'm betting the type of women who would be comfortable doing the studies are already pretty good at many "kinds" of climaxes. And i still want to know why men don't talk about "ball climaxes" or "nipple climaxes" or something. --Pink mowse.pngGodotI live in the Infinite monkey cage 22:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
I am so fucking quoting that everywhere. Scarlet A.pngbomination 22:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Quoting what? -- Seth Peck (talk) 23:00, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

This page is genuinely bad[edit]

It's 50% funpage, 25% allegedly scientific content minus the citations, 25% conservative-baiting. Can we nix the conservative-baiting, plonk the funpage stuff (from here and elsewhere) to a Fun:Sex article, and make this a respectable sources-needed stub? Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 05:45, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps just move the whole thing to Funspace and be done with it? Bongolian (talk) 07:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC)