Fun talk:Pansexuality
That word, I do not think it means what you think it means... --Kels 22:38, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
- INCONCEIVABLE!!!!--PalMD-yada yada 11:37, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
- Looks like a convincing etymology to me. Why go for something boring like, "pan" = "everything/all"?--Bob_M (talk) 07:43, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
- Bah. Pan- is obviously derived, through the Normans, from French panne, which means accident, breakdown, technical error. Thus, 'pansexuality' means a broken sexuality. *nods* --AKjeldsen 08:13, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
- Doesn't this mean we need a companion article on potsexuality? Or is RobS going to come over and complain about us promoting drug use? --Kels 08:18, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
- Bah. Pan- is obviously derived, through the Normans, from French panne, which means accident, breakdown, technical error. Thus, 'pansexuality' means a broken sexuality. *nods* --AKjeldsen 08:13, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
See also: object love, The Berlin Wall: A Love Story. --jtltalk 14:12, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
Link[edit]
Anyone who clumps loads of verbiage into a 495px x 411px scroll box & honestly expects that it'll be read is, at least IMHO, mistaken. This message brought to you by: respondand honey 16:52, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Worthy of fun-status?[edit]
It seems to me that this article contains far too many facts to be mainspace. Perhaps it should be fun-o-lized? Flametail von Karma (talk) 21:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Something funny I noticed about the dual definitions[edit]
If we pansexuals are attracted to "everything", wouldn't that include various forms of metallic cookware?
Yeah, I know, I'm lame. Sensual Endeavor, the sexy pony ;) (talk) 00:09, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Peter Boom page[edit]
This link appears in the Funspace article on Pansexuality: http://digilander.libero.it/pansexuality Is it appropriate to add this link to the External Links section of the mainspace article too? --Tracer (talk) 16:31, 7 November 2014 (UTC)