At All things in moderation, we are currently voting on restrictions on the use of LLMs (chatbots) in RationalWiki. Reminder: you need to have at least 75 edits and to have been registered for at least three months to be eligible to vote.

# Modus tollens

 Cogito ergo sumLogic and rhetoric Key articles General logic Bad logic v - t - e

Modus tollens ("mode of taking") is a logical argument, or rule of inference. (Compare with modus ponens, or "mode of putting.") It is also known as indirect proof or proof by contrapositive, and is a valid form of argument in formal logic.[1]

## As an argument

A modus tollens argument has the following form:

P1: If X, then Y. (i. e. Either not X or Y)
P2: Not Y.
C: Therefore, not X.

For example:

P1: If it is raining, the ground is wet. (i. e. It is not raining or the ground is wet.)
P2: The ground is not wet.
C: Therefore, it is not raining.

The contrapositive of "if X then Y" is "if not Y then not X"; if a proposition is true, then so is its contrapositive.[2]

## As a rule of inference

In propositional logic:

${\displaystyle \left\{X\rightarrow Y,\neg Y\right\}\models \neg X}$

In first-order logic:

${\displaystyle \models _{\mathfrak {A}}\forall x.\left(X(x)\rightarrow Y(x)\right)\wedge \models _{\mathfrak {A}}\exists x.\left(\neg Y(x)\right)\implies \models _{\mathfrak {A}}\exists x.\left(\neg X(x)\right)}$

## Denying the antecedent

See the main article on this topic: Denying the antecedent

It can be contrasted with the fallacy of denying the antecedent, for instance (using the above example) "it is not raining, therefore the ground is not wet" (obviously untrue if you're standing in a lake). Denying the antecedent asserts not-X rather than not-Y.