There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Illicit observation
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Illicit observation | Result: Merged and redirected into Illicit process[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Two sentence stub. DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 04:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
Merge/redirect[edit]
- Isn't this the same as False dilemma? It's certainly similar. --Gospatric (talk) 09:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think the elements in this fallacy are presented as situations, compared to false dilemma. I think in this case, the terms are assumed to be opposites, but ambiguity means they not quite opposed? That's what I'm getting. Examples for this article will surely help. Maybe someone who thinks atheism is starkly opposed to spirituality
? --It's-a me,
LeftyGreenMario! 20:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think the elements in this fallacy are presented as situations, compared to false dilemma. I think in this case, the terms are assumed to be opposites, but ambiguity means they not quite opposed? That's what I'm getting. Examples for this article will surely help. Maybe someone who thinks atheism is starkly opposed to spirituality
- Illicit process has a section leading to this article. We could just move those two sentences there. DuceMoosolini (talk) 20:43, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with DuceMoosolini. Georgie Enkoom (talk) 09:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)