RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/LSD

LSD | Result: Keep

LSD (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. No missional content in this article. At all. —Hamburguesa con queso con un cara  (talk • stalk) 06:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Keep

1. It seems fairly well-researched and written, I don't really see there being any use in deleting. As far as I'm concerned, the more content, just so long as it's of good quality, the better.^{— Unsigned, by: Lord Zedd / talk / contribs}

   Then perhaps it should be moved to the fun space then?—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara  (talk • stalk) 05:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

2. And expand on various forms of opposition. At the moment it seems o be an encyclopedia entry, and I feel RW works best when it's supporting one side of an argument. (yes I know presenting plain facts can do that, but it's like watching grey paint dry) Boredatwork (talk) 12:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

   That's just an incentive to edit, I don't see a need to outright delete it. That just seems counterproductive. Again, regardless of how the information is presented, more is better. If it doesn't fit the mold of the site, than improve it rather than tossing the baby out with the bathwater. Lord Zedd (talk) 19:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

   Then we can add it to the todo list. The article as it stands is not missional. In order to make it missional, all the content would have to be removed. At that point, what's the point in keeping the article at all?—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara  (talk • stalk) 05:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)