RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Perpetual Motion As Its Own Science

Perpetual Motion As Its Own Science | Result: Deleted

Perpetual Motion As Its Own Science (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. it's a load of rubbish Scream!! (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
2. It's a rather on the craptastic side: somewhat skeptical but lacking in science. Anything worth salvaging could be integrated into the existing perpetual motion article. Bongolian (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
3. Gong.MatsFan (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
4. The writing style looks eerily similar to Nathan Coppedge's perpetual motion site linked in the article Hertzy (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
5. That was one hell of a really boring intro, and the article seems to support perpetual motion. I say we nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.Make haste slowly (talk) 07:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)