RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Sci.skeptic

Sci.skeptic | Result: Fed to the Usenet monster

Sci.skeptic (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Orphan page of dead site with no archive.– αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 12:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
2. A skepticism-navelgazing stub. Exterminate with extreme prejudice!!1! 141.134.75.236 (talk) 13:09, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
3. Quick glance at the google group that inherited the name shows a wasteland of spam and inane comment chains. Low signal/noise ratio, in usenet terms. Not a site RW needs to link. CamelCasePragmatist (talk) 15:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep

• Stubby article, but of historical importance - David Gerard (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge/redirect

1. It still seems alive (I added a link to the archives)? Not sure if a separate page is warranted, but some mention somewhere might be good (not sure where though) Carpetsmoker (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

   @RationalWiki:Websites Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 13:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

   Not a website, but yeah, a brief mention there might be okay. Carpetsmoker (talk) 13:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

   Or indeed seed that usenet article that 35 people think is a good idea (though none of them have started it) - David Gerard (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

   Up to 5 minutes ago I thought Usenet and newsgroups were two different things. >_< Carpetsmoker (talk) 18:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

2. Merge to the now-extant Usenet article - David Gerard (talk) 19:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)