RationalWiki:Articles for demotion/Donald Trump

Donald Trump | Result: Status quo

Donald Trump (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Demote to silver

Edward the eight (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

1. good article .Contains a lot of links and is very long.-Aethieizt (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
2. 123goaway (talk) 14:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
3. The brick wall (talk) 00:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Status quo

1. Automatically inegligible for Silver; page contains 10 bare http links in the references on a search alone. Outside of that no direct complaints. If this is resolved, we can consider looking into whether or not Gold status is warranted; the page is much better than it was a year ago when this page was last proposed (in the bar iirc as a broader effort to try and get some more recent Gold articles up) at the very least. I also would like to caution against doing what is basically the "WP:NOTNEWS" tendency; we aren't a newspage, not every shit Trump takes or fail he does has to be reported there. Keep it to the major ones, especially now that Trump re-announced his candidacy. -- Techpriest (talk) 22:58, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

   This page isn't fit for gold,I am surprised that they tried to make this article cover story Edward the eight (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

2. Yeah, still not good enough. 🎄Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano🎄^{Ask about our holiday specials!} 23:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
3. Christopher (talk) 23:57, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
4. Since Trumpf is still an emerging story, it's hard to tell if whatever new behavior emerges will be noteworthy in the long run or not. Still, I'd rather have the choice of pruning irrelevant stuff later than not have it here in the first place. Since Trump is an "ongoing new story" I don't think it is appropriate to demote to silver any time soon. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 00:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
5. Too unstable for silver, probably will be like that until he dies.Andrew5 🎄 (talk) 14:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
6. Per reasons the article is in bronze to begin with. None of them appear to have been addressed. If they are indeed addressed, please clarify if that's the case. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 03:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)