2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $2973.89Goal: $10000

RationalWiki:Articles for demotion/Men's rights movement

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Men's rights movement | Result: Status quo[edit]

Men's rights movement (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Promote to bronze[edit]

  1. Hyrogen oxide (talk) 21:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Status quo[edit]

  1. Can you please elaborate why this should be promoted to bronze? --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 21:39, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  2. Vee (talk) 01:06, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Demote to Gold[edit]

good article certainly missional Aethieizt (talk) 23:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

  1. Article has two uses of Template:Fact, an automatic disqualifier for gold. Plutocow (talk) 23:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
    Also, 114 references seems like a lot, but when there are entire sections with no references it's clearly not sufficient. It's just not ready for gold unfortunately. Plutocow (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Goat[edit]