2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

RationalWiki talk:2016 board of trustees election/Nominations

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

technicallly[edit]

Technically you can't just decide to launch this. However I've just emailed everyone suggesting we go with it - David Gerard (talk) 19:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Good old FCP! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Shit, sorry. Thanks David. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 19:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Gooder older DG! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Some basic information seems to be lacking, like the number of posts to be elected. ħumanUser talk:Human 20:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Added. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 16:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

So...[edit]

What happens if we have less than 5 volunteers for the positions? CorruptUser (talk) 02:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

We enslave the nearest 5 RatWiks and hope for the best? Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 18:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
No one nominated me/my main account? Should I be insulted or relieved? StickySock (talk) 14:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)