RationalWiki talk:Articles for demotion/Archive1

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an archive page, last updated 10 April 2024. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page:  , (new)(back)

The page’s name[edit]

“Brain” when used as a verb means “smash someone’s skull in”. Christopher (talk) 18:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

That's kind of the joke. We do need a good name for this; if this page works right, it will be included as part of the website itself a la Articles for Deletion. CorruptUser 19:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
How about "Articles for Brainstarring"? PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 19:38, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I agree. "Articles for braining" just looks ****ing weird. Avida Dollarsher again 08:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, it's a dumb name. Suggest a good one. CorruptUser 13:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
You know, the name "Articles for Demotion" has grown on me over the past 24 hours. It does go nicely with Articles for Deletion. And I still hope this could be a place where we could discuss stripping an article of its Bronze brainstar or moving it down a level. Spud (talk) 14:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, we do have a lot of Bronze garbage. To change the requirements for BrainStars, we may need a community vote. At the moment, again, we need to agree on the name of this... CorruptUser 14:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
All right then. I vote for the original title as suggested yesterday, Articles for Demotion.Spud (talk) 15:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Going to put a poll in the SB, non-binding but a quick gauge of what others think. CorruptUser 15:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, looks like "Articles for Demotion" is the most popular... CorruptUser 17:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Bronzing[edit]

(EC) Bronzing never used to have to be discussed. You could just do it if you thought the article met the criteria. debronzing was the same. I don't see why that has to change. If you thing a bronze article doesn't deserve the template, remove it. If in doubt, ask on the talk page. However bronze-to-silver or vice versa certainly did need to be discussed every time. Avida Dollarsher again 16:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Giving an article a Bronze was never an issue, but taking it away was, IIRC. I think it should be like deletion; send a message to article's creator, short vote on whether to de-Bronze an article. We have a lot of garbage Bronze articles, which makes it tough to sift through when trying to find stuff to promote to Silver. CorruptUser 16:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
If you don’t want loads of crap bronze articles, de-bronzing should be as easy as bronzing. Christopher (talk) 16:12, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Alright, where are the rules located? Let's see what they actually are... CorruptUser 16:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
It doesn't seem there are rules for de-Bronzing. I guess it's a common sense "de-Bronze it, but let article creator know in their talk page" CorruptUser 16:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
You'll probably find most of those article creators haven't edited for nigh on a decade. Spud (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Yes, but that's also true of the AfD pages too. Anyway, going to de-Bronze some junk...CorruptUser 16:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Why let them know even if they were still around? They didn't go "I'm going to write a bronze-level article article". They most likely didn't even bronze it themselves. Avida Dollarsher again 18:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)