RationalWiki talk:Bureaucrat nominations
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Can we start using this again? Blue (pester) 20:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
A little background[edit]
Among bureaucrats demoted in the last two years:
- AD: registered June 2, 2008, demoted February 1, 2010 (1 year, 8 months)
- Aboriginal Noise: registered June 2, 2008, demoted September 11, 2009 (1 year, 2 months)
- Ace McWicked: registered March 31, 2008, demoted January 16, 2009 (10 months)
- Armondikov: registered March 7, 2008, demoted February 17, 2009 (11 months)
- Concernedresident: registered July 23, 2009, demoted May 29, 2010 (10 months)
- David Gerard: registered May 24, 2008, demoted May 13, 2010 (2 years)
- Gooniepunk2010: registered January 22, 2008, demoted September 7, 2009 (1 year, 7 months)
- LArron: registered August 23, 2008, demoted August 5, 2009 (1 year)
- ListenerX: registered November 10, 2008, demoted August 3, 2009 (11 months)
Not sure what you can read into that. Just some random info from someone bored. Blue (is useful) 20:41, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- They all seem moderately active. Are we proposing cratting someone? Or making a 1 year policy before crat rights? ТyTalk. 20:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- What? "Not sure what you can read into that. Just some random info from someone bored." Blue (is useful) 20:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- You do not seem like a data-addict, you have far to much personality. So... This must have been done for a reason. Tin-foil hat time children! The average time is 14 5/9 months. There is no crat policy+RW internal factionalism+Your parthian shot = making an official cratting policy. The mob rejects policy, seeing it as authoritarian. Thus to avoid HCM/whining... Hmm. </paranoia> ТyTalk. 20:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- What? "Not sure what you can read into that. Just some random info from someone bored." Blue (is useful) 20:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
It has been a while since anyone has been made crat. ТyTalk. 21:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- This is a bit 'Wikipedia' for my liking. Popularity contest. Everyone showing off their massive cocks. Boring. MarcusCicero (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- You suck. I'm not supposed to agree with you. Quarumushroom - You can't explain that! 23:41, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- This is a bit 'Wikipedia' for my liking. Popularity contest. Everyone showing off their massive cocks. Boring. MarcusCicero (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)