RationalWiki talk:Mentions

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: <1>

Book not available on b-ok[edit]

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-16920-6_25 The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 17:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

thesis[edit]

https://dspace.lib.uom.gr/bitstream/2159/23448/4/RaptiMatinaMsc2019.pdf

Regularly, useful idiots are common users that are not fully conscious of the purposes of the group, therefore it is tricky to distinguish them. (“Useful Idiot - RationalWiki” n.d.) “Useful Idiot - RationalWiki.” n.d. Accessed August 13, 2019. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Useful_idiot.

Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 18:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Added. Bongolian (talk) 17:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

study about r/kotakuinaction[edit]

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8894031 https://sci-hub.se/10.1109/TPC.2019.2946942 "Dramapedia: Wiki-related drama and issues including Wikipedia, Rationalwiki, etc" Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk) 13:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

on manosphere publications[edit]

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.07600.pdf Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 18:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Added. Bongolian (talk) 17:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

on incels[edit]

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.08293.pdf Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 22:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Added. Bongolian (talk) 17:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

lol we're mentioned in this comparative religion reading text[edit]

https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/open-textbooks/9/ FuzzyCatPotato of the Pornographic Moist wipes (talk/stalk) 15:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

The cat still exists! The radioactive potato didn't decay and trigger the sensor! ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 15:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Added. Bongolian (talk) 17:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

amphiboly[edit]

https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/5997 Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 16:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Added. Bongolian (talk) 17:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

indigenous science[edit]

This becomes clear in debates about whether indigenous knowledges should be considered ‘science’. A stark instance of an argument against this proposition is the ‘Indigenous science’ page on RationalWiki, a Wiki whose stated aims include refuting the anti-science movement. The culture of RationalWiki is in some ways anti-racist, for example, at the time of writing the wiki’s authors classified ‘racialism’ as ‘pseudoscientific bullshit’ [RationalWiki contributors, 2019]. However, the ‘Indigenous science’ page reveals the scientistic limits of this anti-racism. It classified indigenous science (singular) as ‘a pseudoscience’ that ‘should not be confused with legitimate research about indigenous people and their worldviews, such as in anthropology’ [RationalWiki contributors, 2018]. It asserted that the view of some Western-trained Australian Indigenous scientists that Indigenous knowledge is science is ‘unsupportable’ [Australian Science Media Centre, 2018; RationalWiki contributors, 2018]. This is Eurocentric gatekeeping by Western science’s advocates, and hardly the sole such example [e.g. Hikuroa, 2017; Nhalevilo, 2013; Nicholas, 2019]. Notwithstanding some indigenous peoples’ reservations about eliding distinctions between indigenous knowledges and Western science (discussed in section 4 below), it demonstrates the power of conferring the word ‘science’ upon anything. This is an important strategic reason some Indigenous scientists describe themselves using terms such as ‘STEMoriginal’ [Moggridge, 2018] or assert that Indigenous Australians were the world’s first scientists [de Napoli, 2018; Diamond, 2019], while at the same time maintaining distinct identities for Indigenous and Western sciences.

https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/19/02/JCOM_1902_2020_A02

FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 12:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Fucking lol. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 13:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
What's so funny? Oxyaena Harass 13:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

The race realists don't love us[edit]

[1] lol. It's Elsevier, do we have a category for "sucking vampire squid on science itself" - David Gerard (talk) 15:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

@David Gerard They do love to hate us though. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 15:32, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

a css book lol[edit]

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4842-5750-0_1 FᴜᴢᴢʏCᴀᴛPᴏᴛᴀᴛᴏ, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 21:21, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

epistemology paper[edit]

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02698595.2020.1767891 Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 13:56, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

manosphere paper[edit]

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manoel_Ribeiro7/publication/338737324_The_Evolution_of_the_Manosphere_Across_the_Web/links/5eec972f458515814a6acc03/The-Evolution-of-the-Manosphere-Across-the-Web.pdf Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 03:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

religion paper[edit]

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 13:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)