RationalWiki talk:What is going on in the clogosphere?/Archive2

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an archive page, last updated 5 August 2009. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page: , (new)(back)

Baby killer wigo[edit]


Sick fuck. Nice wigo (sad I only had one vote). Now I need to rub the ugly off my ass in the grass. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

That guy runs a pretty nasty little website, too. Some of the contributors are pretty monstrous. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 20:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Broken link in dino-bird WIGO[edit]

The link to the scientific article is broken (missing cookie) -- 15:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Farah & Boone[edit]

Maybe it's because I'm far less acquainted with fundamentalist lunacy than most of the other people here, but those last two WIGOs from WorldNetDaily truly shocked me. If Joseph Farah actually believes Obama secretly meant that he's planning on reopening the Holocaust, then he needs double his Risperdal dosage. If not, then it's just tremendously irresponsible. Pat Boone's post is nearly as bad. How could Christian religious freedom possibly be in jeopardy? I'm not sure where Pat Boone resides, but there's so many churches in my neighborhood that it can only be described as supersaturation. It's enough to make angels vomit. Christians are still very dominant in this country, where's the danger of losing any freedom? God forbid you can't tell queers that they're going to hell, Christianity would just fall apart without that core tenet. Then of course he invokes the end times, the mark of the wingnut. Aren't the end times a good thing? Doesn't Jesus come back and believers go to heaven? Inflammatory rhetoric like this is totally unnecessary, and at worst dangerous. I will never understand how these people can rationalize what they do. I'll probably become less surprised by it as I hang around RW longer, but at the moment these people really disgust me. --PitchBlackMind 20:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Dear, WorldNutDaily is the respectable face of the rightwingnutters. Do take half an hour or so checking this out. And then you will never be shocked again. Scared, maybe. Shocked, no. Dendlai 01:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


Have I been reading WND too long, because I still can't help but feel there are slight anti-Obama overtones to this even if I can't explain why? If we could find away of linking to individual forum postings we could give this place its own WIGO, some of the shit there readers say is crazier than the articles by along way. - π 02:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

The article mentions Bush (I can't tell if it is senior or junior) at the end. That's the least they can do. And at least they aren't putting Obama Head on Mount Rushmore along with the other 4 heads. [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 02:38, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
That is really why the article is stupid. They initially make it sound like he is being added to Mount Rushmore in some way, but this is a normal thing for every president. - π 02:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
It was Bush junior (W.). Oh, and senior - the one without the middle initials is usually papa. And the article seems "ok" to me - starts off a little weird, but is completely clear about what's being done. I didn't bother to assault my senses by digging out the comments, though. ħumanUser talk:Human 06:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Democratic trophy wives[edit]

Elizabeth Kucinich, maybe? She's pretty hot. --Gulik 16:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Is hotness the only qualifier here for being a trophy wife? Or is it because she's so much younger than him? I've always thought of a trophy wife as a person who brings absolutely nothing else to the table outside of being pretty, she was actually doing some good shit with her life prior to marrying him.--PitchBlackMind 17:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
A trophy-wife is, as the name implies, a wife who was married for the purposes of showing her off as a trophy; mostly paint-slathered tarts who marry rich old men to appear as arm decorations at social functions, etc. Mrs. Kucinich is not a trophy-wife, but a crank and the wife of a crank, which is how those two hooked up. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 17:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't see much in the WP article on her that qualifies her as a crank, but maybe you've got a different definition of the term. Although trophy-wife makes me think of the McCain-Palin ticket... --Kels 19:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
See here and here; also here for the place where she worked when the Forces of Destiny caused her to meet Mr. Kucinich, an event that was apparently prophesied by the fact that she once lived on a street called "Dennis Lane." Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 19:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Believing you were destined to marry the person you end up marrying sounds more "quaint" or "cute" than "crank" to me. Lots of people say stuff like that. As to the AMI, I'll have to take your word for it, the WP article doesn't say much cranky about them. They seriously need a better web designer though, that stuff's pretty ugly. --Kels 19:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Look at one page on their website instead; that is the very definition of crankishness ("THE TRUTH BANKERS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW!", etc.). As to the destiny business, Mrs. Kucinich seriously thinks that, based on New Age beliefs her mother taught her. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 19:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Prosh kidstuff[edit]

Not exactly from the clogosphere, but powerfully cute in any event.

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svgUser:Nutty Roux/sigtalk 19:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm at a complete loss for words. Amazing.--PitchBlackMind 19:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
They should get them bear skins instead; that actually worked. That or magic mushrooms, anyway. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 19:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
They said FUD! ħumanUser talk:Human 19:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
And I want a set. And a special Sword of God too, for smiting infidels. ħumanUser talk:Human 19:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)