|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 13:56, 31 August 2015 diff hist +169 White History Month Couldn't think of an explanation before you needlessly reverted? I've given my explanation in the talk page, so let's see yours. Or you could just keep reverting without any rationale you can give, on a wiki that purports to be "rational."
- 13:22, 31 August 2015 diff hist +169 White History Month That's contradictory with the first sentence of the article, "celebration of the white race..." Also, the portion that I'm editing only refers to ethnic groups and I've never mentioned race. On your basis alone, the Cat:racism should be removed.
- 12:37, 31 August 2015 diff hist +169 White History Month You haven't answered any of my rebuttals to your counterarguments.
- 12:56, 30 August 2015 diff hist -218 Affirmative action I don't need to make a talk page topic because I have succinctly and I think sufficiently explained my views in the edit summaries. If you want to express your objections to my edits, I would welcome you to do so.
- 12:54, 30 August 2015 diff hist +16 m Talk:White History Month
- 12:53, 30 August 2015 diff hist +1,413 Talk:White History Month
- 12:42, 30 August 2015 diff hist +169 White History Month From the CS: "Avoid edit wars. If an edit you make is repeatedly reverted, or someone has otherwise objected to it, then discuss it on the article's talk page. It is the best possible way for editors to reach any sort of understanding or compromise."
- 12:36, 30 August 2015 diff hist +169 White History Month You aren't justifying your reverts. You aren't answering any of my points. You aren't being "rational." From the CS: "If an edit you make is repeatedly reverted, or someone has otherwise objected to it, then discuss it on the article's talk page."
- 12:22, 30 August 2015 diff hist +169 White History Month You aren't establishing why you're reverting my edits. Nothing I'm doing is blatant vandalism. You also blocked me, even though the guidelines say, "Blocking should never occur if somebody is attempting to discuss an issue in a reasonable manner."
- 12:07, 30 August 2015 diff hist +143 User talk:PacWalker →Reverting: new section
- 12:01, 30 August 2015 diff hist +169 White History Month See the talk page
- 11:59, 30 August 2015 diff hist +804 N Talk:White History Month →Contradictory arguments: new section
- 11:20, 30 August 2015 diff hist +169 White History Month Fine, but this conclusion is unavoidable. Furthermore, the article failed to justify the classification of the subject under racism.
- 11:20, 30 August 2015 diff hist -218 Affirmative action This phrasing is more consistent with common formulations. By this reasoning, any policy favoring the majority in a country couldn't be affirmative action. Cite the guideline which this edit violates.
- 11:15, 30 August 2015 diff hist -49 Greed No, that is an application of her ethical principle to the acquisition of wealth. This is like saying that liberals dysphemize "perpetual desire to acquire of wealth" by calling it "greed". They identify the action as greed and call it such later.
- 10:57, 30 August 2015 diff hist -49 Greed →See also: It is not accurate to say that Rand euphemised "greed". Rational egoism was her ethics, which includes greed within an economic context. She extolled the virtues of sex, friendship, and art in this way. She also used the word "greed."
- 10:50, 30 August 2015 diff hist -5 m Janet Porter →Publications
- 10:25, 30 August 2015 diff hist +3 User talk:Arisboch →Unwelcome
- 10:24, 30 August 2015 diff hist +690 User talk:Arisboch →Unwelcome: new section
- 10:10, 30 August 2015 diff hist -176 Affirmative action White people are also an incredible minority worldwide, but policies favoring their employment would not be considered affirmative action. Nice try, though.
- 10:08, 30 August 2015 diff hist -232 White History Month Again, there's no valid reasoning why such an argument wouldn't apply equally to all months celebrating ethnicities as it does to White History Month. Unless that argument will be posted on other heritage months or the reasoning clarified, it goes.
- 09:57, 30 August 2015 diff hist -232 White History Month Is it not established why this reasoning would oppose the possibility of a White History Month, but allow for the months of other ethnicities.
- 09:52, 30 August 2015 diff hist -176 Affirmative action Other countries have affirmative action and the policy does not apply only to Blacks, but also to all minorities. Furthermore, affirmative action can also apply to women, who are hardly a minority.