|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 03:28, 25 July 2015 diff hist +590 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford: Response
- 11:34, 19 July 2015 diff hist +25 Henry Ford
- 02:30, 19 July 2015 diff hist -3,986 Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford: No reason for 1/6 of the article to be about a person other than Hitler. That can be discussed in the Ford article.
- 02:29, 19 July 2015 diff hist +3,969 N Henry Ford This content is more appropriate to an article about Ford than Hitler.
- 23:10, 18 July 2015 diff hist -111 Adolf Hitler German is a different language from English, so we would have to look at what word Hitler used that was translated into independent and if it was the same word German translators of The International Jew used, so that statement needs to go.
- 23:09, 18 July 2015 diff hist -53 Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford: Hitler did not copy any of his writings from Ford. This claim was sourced to Mein Kampf. I've read that book before, Hitler never said that in that book. He only mentioned Ford once in the book, & it was what was quoted above.
- 23:07, 18 July 2015 diff hist +300 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford and the Nazi War Machine
- 16:19, 18 July 2015 diff hist -83 Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford: Hitler only mentions Ford one time in Mein Kampf, and that was only in the first edition. Ford was not mentioned in any of the subsequent editions.
- 14:24, 18 July 2015 diff hist +361 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 14:22, 18 July 2015 diff hist +702 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 14:17, 18 July 2015 diff hist -2 Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford: I mean to say of Ford
- 14:16, 18 July 2015 diff hist -74 Adolf Hitler Fixed citation.
- 14:15, 18 July 2015 diff hist +72 Adolf Hitler Undo revision 1496621 by PaulBustion87 (talk)I made a mistake in how the citation was written and accidentally removed it, I have to revert myself to fix it.
- 14:13, 18 July 2015 diff hist -72 Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford: The statement that Ford was one of Hitler's chief financial backers was not supported by the citation. The citation only said that there were rumors that Ford financially backed Hitler, it did not say they were correct.
- 13:22, 18 July 2015 diff hist +548 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 13:12, 18 July 2015 diff hist +400 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 10:48, 18 July 2015 diff hist +656 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 09:00, 18 July 2015 diff hist -5 Rockefeller Republican Rockefeller Republicans were left-wing, but not radical leftists. A radical leftist would be someone like a Bolshevik, a Maoist, a Castro supporter, etc.
- 22:08, 17 July 2015 diff hist +756 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 21:50, 17 July 2015 diff hist +805 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 21:47, 17 July 2015 diff hist +305 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 21:46, 17 July 2015 diff hist +1,441 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 21:05, 17 July 2015 diff hist +657 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 20:56, 17 July 2015 diff hist +1,277 Talk:Adolf Hitler
- 20:10, 17 July 2015 diff hist -138 Adolf Hitler Removed discredited conspiracy theorist as source.
- 19:57, 17 July 2015 diff hist +645 Talk:Adolf Hitler Antony Sutton not a mainstream source.
- 19:44, 17 July 2015 diff hist +622 Talk:Adolf Hitler
- 11:44, 17 July 2015 diff hist +505 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford
- 21:20, 14 July 2015 diff hist -4,049 Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford: Henry Ford was not a Nazi, he was not even a German. He was also NOT opposed to all forms of Judaism, mainly those that he perceived rightly or wrongly as being Bolshevik. He does not belong in an article on Hitler.
- 09:10, 14 July 2015 diff hist +560 Talk:Adolf Hitler →Henry Ford: new section
- 08:42, 30 May 2015 diff hist -1 Rockefeller Republican →Positions: They were not fiscal conservatives. Nelson Rockefeller led one of the highest state tax rates not only in New York history, but in the history of the USA.
- 18:41, 21 May 2015 diff hist +246 Law enforcement
- 12:01, 21 May 2015 diff hist -1 User talk:PaulBustion87
- 12:00, 21 May 2015 diff hist +709 User talk:PaulBustion87
- 11:57, 21 May 2015 diff hist +3 m Bestiality →Come here doggie woggie...: Correcting grammar. Actually, I think that point is perfectly valid to be honest.
- 11:55, 21 May 2015 diff hist +2 Bestiality They would be laws against beastiality, not against zoophilia.
- 11:53, 21 May 2015 diff hist +69 User talk:PaulBustion87 clarification
- 11:52, 21 May 2015 diff hist +1,270 User talk:PaulBustion87
- 11:41, 21 May 2015 diff hist +1,994 User talk:PaulBustion87
- 11:37, 21 May 2015 diff hist +273 User talk:PaulBustion87 Wikipedia's chief expert on sex agrees with me.
- 11:33, 21 May 2015 diff hist +1,291 User talk:PaulBustion87
- 11:18, 21 May 2015 diff hist +382 User talk:PaulBustion87
- 11:16, 21 May 2015 diff hist +39 User talk:PaulBustion87 →Paedophilia article: Forget it, I'll just have to redo my signature, I've always found signing my name on these wikis hard.
- 11:15, 21 May 2015 diff hist -133 User talk:PaulBustion87 correcting signature
- 11:14, 21 May 2015 diff hist +265 User talk:PaulBustion87
- 11:13, 21 May 2015 diff hist +556 User talk:PaulBustion87
- 11:04, 21 May 2015 diff hist -209 British Empire Its ridiculous that five different names for the same state are being listed. We can pipelink to the article about the country if people do not know what the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is.
- 10:50, 21 May 2015 diff hist +72 British Empire Also the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, which the UK became in 1922-1927, the colonial empire still existed for at least two decades after that.
- 10:30, 21 May 2015 diff hist +291 User talk:PaulBustion87 →Paedophilia article
- 10:28, 21 May 2015 diff hist +605 User talk:PaulBustion87 Different criticism of the article