Talk:2017 German federal elections

Merkel Kritik

Disregard this! I read millions instead of million--Benaresh (talk) 10:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Party summary

I added a short description for the German Greens and the Liberals, in addition to some history. I am going to expand on their Strategies for the Election when i get my hands on the Party Programs.--Benaresh (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

It's really good to have someone else to help to write the page, as I am not german and don't know much about german politics. Diacelium (talk) 17:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

It's cool! i like to help out instead of whining on the Talk Pages and writing about something i actually have a clue on feels good! I know you are busy doing the French Election, so i got you covered on ZE GERMAN FRONT ;p --Benaresh (talk) 17:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

This article is really really badly writen

It's not just the poor sourcing. The whole thing reads like a Reddit comment. IMHO the page would be much better if it literally just said how parties are doing in the polls, nothing else. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 16:36, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Even that is unnecessary. I think we can delete this page, there isn't anything happening in that Election, that is worth the attention of RW.--Benaresh (talk) 17:05, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Suggestion

Create an 'Elections of 2017 page' - and turn this into a redirect page: so these elections, the French Presidential elections and the UK General Election (not to be confused with General Mayham) and any others that have happened or may arise during the remainder of the year can be 'compared, contrasted, snarked individually or collectively and otherwise (mis)treated as appropriate to RW.' 86.191.125.209 (talk) 09:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

I think it would get too long personally. Christopher (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Deletion

Well this is the first time i tried to delete an Article and seeing that nothing missional is happening i wonder why we can't delete this Clusterfest. --Benaresh (talk) 15:15, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Because you failed to properly use RW:AFD. It's really not that hard, just follow the instructions and see what others think of it.--JorisEnter (talk) 15:22, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

I see. Was the passive agressive tone necessary? "It's really not that hard" is implying that you think i lack intellect.--Benaresh (talk) 15:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)