To most fundamentalist Christians, this poor, extinct creature is just as bad as we liberals. Why? Because it is a bird, with scales, and this makes evolution look slightly credible! In conclusion, this bird was definitely an evil socialist. Probably supported tolerance, diversity, and all of the liberal propaganda!--Lefty (talk) 23:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Adding new evidence for Dinosauria having feathers - even MORE evidence against the argument that the Archaeopteryx was already a bird...
To anyone of consequence -
Is there anyone out there who may be able to provide a accurate synopsis/overview of the current evidence supporting feathered Dinosaurs?
News links (from Google)
http://www.sci-tech-today.com/news/Feathered-Dinosaur-Fossils-Found/story.xhtml?story_id=13200D3Q0VJO http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/science/dinosaur-dig-in-china-turns-up-largest-known-feathered-animal.html?_r=0 http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/03/090318-new-dinosaur-feathers.html http://www.iol.co.za/scitech/technology/dinosaur-tail-feathers-were-orange-study-1.471729#.UJGagsUvSno http://www.examiner.com/article/first-feathered-dinosaurs-north-america-discovered http://now.msn.com/dinosaurs-evolved-feathers-for-courtship-rituals
And before anyone "Why don't you do it yourself"'s me, I am just an electrical engineer with no special skills in describing biology. I mean a true professional - someone who could make this a 100% valid article with accurate sourcing (to BOOKS as well as weblinks). — Unsigned, by: Tbird83ii / talk / contribs
- Technically birds are dinosaurs, the line between them is so blurred its basically a door. Sandflapjack (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)