2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $1675.86Goal: $10000
Information icon.svg At the chicken coop, we are currently voting on a change to the blocking policy to clarify when offsite behavior such as harassment and brigading can get someone banned from RW. A reminder that you need at least 75 edits and to have had an account for at least 3 months to vote.

Talk:Argumentum ad sarcina inserta

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wow. My page survived a night and an edit by someone else. That is exciting.

What.[edit]

--AndYourFoesShallRejoice... (talk) 14:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Package inserts[edit]

There is some interesting research on package inserts, including evidence that medical and pharmaceutical practitioners are less likely to read them before taking drugs than patients are.[1][2] Not sure if this belongs here or not. --Annanoon (talk) 15:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Is it really a stub?[edit]

I think the article is long enough. Can I remove the stub indicator?--Deli-delibirda! (talk) 10:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Stubs are usually really short articles that have potential for expansion. This article is short and seems mostly complete. I removed the stub template. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 20:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you.--Deli-delibirda! (talk) 10:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)