User talk:AndYourFoesShallRejoice...

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, AndYourFoesShallRejoice...!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.Moderator 20:37, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Who are you?[edit]

Do you have a brain? Or are you a victim of the propaganda machine? Can you not free your mind and think for yourself? I am a paladin of truth and justice. Marcus Cicero SPQR100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 22:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

The wheel of Ezekiel but not UFO's in general, i engineer woo?[edit]

Do you think Ezekiel's wheel should be removed from the engineer woo category? Exiled Encyclopedist (talk) 03:09, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Read the description of Category:Engineer woo - it's for woo perpetrated by engineers, not woo concerning engineering, or anything that could be vaguelly connected to engineering. The Ezekiel's wheel article is in the category because a large portion of it concerns the work of Blumrich. The fact that he's a "NASA engineer" is often used to lend credence to his claims.--AndYourFoesShallRejoice... (talk) 09:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrolled[edit]

Upon a detailed and exhaustive examination of the body of work that you have submitted to this website, I have concluded that: you ain't crazy. On the aforementioned grounds, I grant you autopatrolled status. If you just ameliorate up a common bowling ball, you'll go far. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 10:34, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

*cringe* --AndYourFoesShallRejoice... (talk) 10:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
YOU KILLED MY {{rit}}!!1! Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 15:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Is my sig better now?[edit]

KOMF's Userpage/Talk Anonymous user is afraid that they will die. 08:52, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

I am still asking myself that. --TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 09:29, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Problems with RW[edit]

Re: post in saloon:

What do you think they are, what would fix them? Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 14:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

  1. If I could rattle them off in something shorter than a long essay, I would have done it a long time ago. (Another reason is that some of them concern specific users and patterns of user behavior, which I'm unwilling to comment on given recent and not-so-recent events.)
  2. Nothing that you can feasibly do, given the current climate here. At least because some of them are manifestations of problems within the larger skeptical movement.
In conclusion, you can look up the meaning of the phrase "the writing on the wall".--AndYourFoesShallRejoice... (talk) 15:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Well do you think there is anything that can reverse this trend at least on this wiki?--Owlman (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Probably me becoming a glowing admirer of Saint Elon and his stoopid Hyperloop which is about as pseudo-science as engineering can get... 141.23.69.52 (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQZmCJUSC6g --AndYourFoesShallRejoice... (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
What trend? I haven't said anything specific other than a vague allusion to doom. --AndYourFoesShallRejoice... (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Then what items, trends, or proof justify your vague illusion of doom? If something convinced you...what was it? -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 16:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)