Talk:Christian pacifism

I think the article really short-changes "just war" theory. However, Catholics also make no pretense at being pacifists, so I don't see the point of having them in there at all. Researcher 13:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Reason for revert

Adjective calling the rapture silly was removed by an anonymous editor, and in absence of a credible citation determining the rapture to be silly, I think we should keep it out. Let the reader decide if the rapture is silly or not. ConservapediaEditor (talk) 02:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

You are on the wrong wiki my friend. - π 03:31, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The rapture is so silly it's beyond silly - is stoopid. (silly implies some affection on behalf of the person describing something as silly, to me anyhoo) ^{I am eating} _& honey^chat 03:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

I thought I did that, undid a lame removal of "silly". I'm still logged in, I doubt CE knows what she's talking about. ħuman 05:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm a Postmill Christian and I agree that the rapture is silly and "stupid", but I find the language used on this site to be very opinionated. I think you can make a statement that a group has a rapture view without expressing your dumb opinions. And believe me, you are dumb... I think you know that too.^{— Unsigned, by: 209.193.69.169 / talk / contribs}

This site admits that it is opinionated. But it is a complete surpise that I am dumb. I have wasted my life. Aceⁱ⁹ 06:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Sojourners

I disagree with the assertion that Sojourners is "probably pro-life and creationist". I've read them, off and on, for some time. If they're "creationists", it's from the "theistic evolution" standpoint, and in any case, it's not a focus of theirs -- social justice is their focus. As for pro-life, they generally take the "let's end abortion by creating a world where it's not needed" viewpoint, and not a "repeal Roe v. Wade philosophy." MDB (talk) 15:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Go for it and be WP:BOLD, and WP:SOFIXIT! Secret Squirrel (talk) 01:57, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Stupid page!

I can't believe the opinions stinking up this site like a bad banana! wheeew it is ripe!

Is this site serious?^{— Unsigned, by: 209.193.69.169 / talk / contribs}

See here Aceⁱ⁹ 06:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

And here. Aceⁱ⁹ 06:07, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

"Thou shalt not kill"

It's not kill. It's murder, implying that the victim is also living under the same laws. The Bible makes it abundantly clear that the Other is to be slaughtered, without hesitation -God even gets mad when the Israelites fail to complete their task of genocide. --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 18:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Nevertheless, it's the KJV translation of the phrase as "thou shalt not kill" that has entered the popular consciousness (in the English speaking world). Wěǎšěǐǒǐď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 19:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC)