| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Talk:Civil disobedience
Suggesting a merger[edit]
I suggest we merge this article with the article on Passive resistance in order to generate a single, more expansive and more nouanced overall article? It woud allow us to "retype" both of them in a cohesive manner in order to produce something a lot more meaningful than what we have currently. Same suggestion posted in the talk thread for the Passive resistance page, directing discussion to this page. Civil disobedience being a form of passive resistance, I think the "new" article should be named Passive resistance and Civil disobedience be a redirect to it as such, with a subsection named Civil disobedience (if found apt). Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:43, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
- If you want, you can use
{{dup}}and make it a bit easier. I suggest that civil disobedience be the name of the article, however, because passive resistance is actually a form of civil disobedience. Passive resistance is targeted inaction against the law (civil disobedience), while civil disobedience includes violent and nonviolent means. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 21:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)