From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon evolution.svg

This Evolution related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.



I'm wondering what the point of this article really is. I followed the link to History of the Earth and it isn't even well-written. As in, it's badly written. So why do we care about this "not very active" wiki? humanbe in 17:48, 14 August 2007 (CDT)

That article was awesome, best one on the EvoWiki. Certainly more well written than anything on Conservapedia --Uncle J 09:13, 25 September 2007 (EDT)

Everyone to their own. Better than CP isn't saying much, I've known four year olds better than cp. ;-) Susantalk to me 10:56, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
A vandal attack just went on there. --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 15:40, 1 December 2007 (EST)

Darn, the server is down. :( --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 19:30, 2 December 2007 (EST)

Yeah, I came here to say something along those lines. DOS attacks work well if they're still on Siteground... humanUser talk:Human 19:38, 2 December 2007 (EST)
It's working again. I even fixed the third person voice in their article on us (most of it was second person plural, a bit weird). humanUser talk:Human 14:29, 4 December 2007 (EST)

The following advertisement was paid for by Proxima Centauri[edit]

EvoWiki is commonly vandalized by creationists[1]. Users who are sysops on RationalWiki may apply to become sysops there and help with vandals. EvoWiki will probably need some type of confirmation that you are the person you claim to be and not a Christian Fundy in disguise. Email should do. --Proxima Centauri

EvoWiki down for good?[edit]

What's up with EvoWiki lately? It's been all "EvoWiki has a problem" for months. 12:20, 2 February 2009 (EST)

Evolution on the internet is finished on the internet!!4! -- Nx talk 12:33, 2 February 2009 (EST)

I miss EvoWiki. Does anyone know if it's coming back? Fred 12:29, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Locked down[edit]

I felt the sentence was redundant, given the infobox at the bottom. Тyeh? 03:50, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

It's perfectly appropriate in a section describing the general circumstances of the wiki. Nutty Rouxnever mind 03:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Alright. ТyNo 03:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

We now own as well, NCSE transferred ownership to us. If someone wants to find a way to work that in. (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Ouch, that template is ugly. It could do with less brains spilling over the text... ħumanUser talk:Human 06:52, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Wait, NCSE trusted us...? Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 06:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes, but its just a begining! Tmtoulouse (talk) 01:59, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Down again[edit]

Is it going to be back up? It looks like the domain expired Nogods4you (talk) 05:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)