RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $4200Goal: $6000

Talk:Frequency illusion

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I think this content might fit better as just part of the list in List of cognitive biases rather than as a free-standing entry. Other than the nifty alternate name (The Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon), I don't see much prospect for expansion. MarmotHead (talk) 19:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

For a start, it needs sources.--ZooGuard (talk) 13:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
OK, that wasn't easy/fun. I still doubt there's much more to this, but one barely comprehensible paper from a sea of incomprehensible papers seems to help a little. That, or I have a research-induced concussion. MarmotHead (talk) 15:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

The moral of the story is...[edit]

... learn a new 'difficult word or odd topic' a day (and improve your powers of observation (and even become an expert). (talk) 15:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Werid name[edit]

Why's it called "Baader-Meinhof phenomenon"?--Arisboch (talk) 15:39, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Because of one incident in a St. Paul newspaper's comment section where a commenter was astounded by hearing the name of this 1970s-1980s German terrorist group multiple times in a day. He commented about it. It took off from there. Yeah, really. MarmotHead (talk) 18:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

TIL Frequency Illusion[edit]

This page was linked from /r/todayilearned and sits at 4531 points. Might be worth improving article, eh? Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 23:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)