Talk:H2Om

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives for this talk page: , (new)


Founders[edit]

Whoever was writing this section seems to have got confused. The link and mission statement was for http://www.lovefoundation.com which is not related to the http://www.loveplanetfoundation.org which is sponsored by H2Om. We should get our facts straight, Lex made a good edit which was reverted. I changed the link but the paragraph need a rewrite. Redchuck.gif Генгисevolving 08:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Charity[edit]

Is it worth pointing out that Lex, creator of H2Om is the co-founder of the charity that H2Om donates money to[1]? Does he take a salary from the charity? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 10:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh, and his wife is the other co-founder[2]. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 10:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hmm, I can't find any reference to the Love Planet Foundation on the California Secretary of State site[3] or Edgar[4], does it work differently in the US? In the UK we can just search companies house or the charity commision. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 10:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Silver[edit]

This is a rather nice article. Тytalk 13:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Sections further down need some actual exposition. Two lines saying "it's technobabble, and this is bad m'kay?" aren't really up to much. ADK...I'll defenestrate your t-shirt! 13:40, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Okey dokey. Тytalk 13:41, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Hmmm... "energies, frequencies and resonance" my specialist subject! ADK...I'll execrate your boat! 13:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
"Energy is the basic building block of everything and frequency, often called resonance..." IS JUST PLAIN FUCKING WRONG! ADK...I'll advocate your paycheck! 13:44, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Their site makes my head hurt... Тytalk 13:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I've finished having a fit now. It makes amusing reading for anyone who has ever, you know, studied physics and chemistry. ADK...I'll abandon your demon! 13:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I don't know what makes me sadder, the people who buy this, or the people who came up with it. Тytalk 13:59, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Ty, people to try to make money on anything never "make me sad". at least they have a brain of some kind, that is saying "ok, how to make money..." What makes me sad is that ANYONE buys crap like this. it's water. in a bottle with an Om on it. as the article said - fricking paste an om to your permanent (why waste plastic) bottle, play some pretty music, and voila!Pink mowse.pngEn attendant Godot 14:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I think I know someone who has some, she buys everything we have an article on pretty much.Тytalk 14:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Just to make a point, I had an angry and semi-humourous screed here about you EC-ing me on the article. Then you EC'd me here. I'm going to feck off and do some real work for half an hour. ADK...I'll absorb your buddy! 14:02, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
funny considering after that edit I had to go run an errand.Тytalk 14:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Grins- are you desperate for silver, ty? I don't think this one is anything beyond bronze. it's not very clear in many points, it's redundant, and it's about a small company doing stupid ass shit. I'd keep it a bronze, both for the topic and for the writing. Pink mowse.pngEn attendant Godot 14:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

See also[edit]

I'm looking for an opinion on "see also". it seems to me that if you've hotlinked some topic within the text, it should not be part of the "see also" section. anyone have opinions one way or the other?Pink mowse.pngEn attendant Godot 14:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Pissed at us?[edit]

Pics or it didn't happen. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 22:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)