RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3900Goal: $6000


From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Ideology and science.[edit]

It is sometimes claimed, by defensive ideologues, that science itself is an ideology. It might be useful to add this topic. There has been a lot written about the effect science has had on ethics and morality, and transpired into ideology. A number of ideologies have presented as scientific or anti-scientific. Many ideologies can actually be graded as scientific (by percentage) or unscientific (with a zero grade). Economic ideologies are of the former kind, while most religious ideologies (all?) are of the latter variety.Ariel31459 (talk) 17:07, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

I don't see any logically intrinsic overlap between "ideology" and "science", per se. I mean — science is done by human beings, and human beings often subscribe to ideologies, but... It seems far fetched to list "science" as a subheader of "ideology" as a result. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 18:21, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
A page on "science is an ideology" could be interesting, if you can find high-profile people saying such. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 18:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Science itself doesn't contain a blueprint for building a utopian society, even if the builders of utopias have claimed that their plans are scientific. - Smerdis of Tlön, LOAD "*", 8, 1. 18:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Though it'd be hard to argue that a utopian society would not be based upon scientific principles... FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 18:34, 30 June 2017 (UTC)


Here is a relevant term I have seldom heard: Ideologism (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ideologism) is an analogue of Scientism carried over to the misapplication of ideology to a problem outside its domain of discourse. Scientism, in its extreme form, presumes science can solve all human questions. Science then becomes wedded to an ideology, and therefore some of its results become susceptible of being declared unscientific, or unfalsifiable. Examples of ideologisms: quack science posed in religious arguments against scientific theories such as evolution and climate change, or certain gender claims about ontological status of biological sex, e.g.,(https://www.quora.com/Is-Nicholas-Matte-correct-that-there-is-no-such-thing-as-biological-sex). Thus an ideologism is often an attempt to answer a question at least partially dependent on nature with a blunt ideological method.Ariel31459 (talk) 18:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)