From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Inrasound is interesting and it does, without being heard, produce some weird effects on a person. I think it is on-mission. Acei9 04:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

see here. Acei9 04:52, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
And it made for an interesting point in my first Conservapedia debate so I felt like making a page about it. TKEtoolshedFrag Out! 04:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Well, personal CP anecdotes on a mainspace article isn't really article worthy however perhaps write about the above link? Acei9 04:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
The article should have more references and examples. And writing in the first person is not good in a mainspace article. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 04:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
There's definitely more stuff to be talked about, but it can't hurt to have a page about it, especially if it has arisen in a creationism-evolution debate. It's just good to know what people are talking about so you can refute it if you ever have to. I do have to reference it, though. I'm a science person and I was more or less writing from personal knowledge. Points about first person and anecdotes taken. TKEtoolshedFrag Out! 05:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
This comes up quite often in NS see: The word , tigers, ghosts haunting and more ghosts.--BobBring back the hat! 10:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
This is easily on-mission if we include the ghost stuff. Leave out the tigers though, too much like felidae for me. Totnesmartin (talk) 12:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

I like the idea of the page, and believe it could definitely be on-mission, but it needs something to link to it and to be more enmeshed in the wiki in general. Any ideas? Researcher (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Write up Ghost so it's non-crap? Totnesmartin (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Can link back and forth to audio woo. Some mention of the "brown note" ought to be made ;) Also needs more actual details on how YECcers/woomeisters use it to bolster their "theories", not just a random assertion that they do. ħumanUser talk:Human 20:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
We must bring in the brown note - and can we look like a bunch of old hippies trump Wikipedia by mentioning the Edgar Broughton Band's use of the note on their first album? Totnesmartin (talk) 21:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
All of which I can do. Just busy at the moment. TKEtoolshedFrag Out! 21:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
And as far as the YEC stuff goes, there was more detail personal anecdotes about how it was used in the article, but it got deleted (probably rightfully so). I don't know about anybody else, but I heard it a lot growing up in a YEC-type family/church as an example of how god guides his creation, making the ark story plausible, somehow. It also reached near-meme status in a Schlafly debate I had, so I figured I'd write something about it. A lot of cool ghost stuff too. And the brown note. And maybe some of those crazy Nazi sound weapons. And maybe sonic levitation. All kinds of good, on-mission pseudoscience. TKEtoolshedFrag Out! 22:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
And that French scientist who got turned into a pile of goo by it. Totnesmartin (talk) 22:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Huh? TKEtoolshedFrag Out! 22:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

I should really consider adding more stuff to this article[edit]

Sometime soon. TKEtoolshedFrag Out! 03:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Why did this get deleted? I see no discussion... ħumanUser talk:Human 21:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
I nominated it for deletion when it was much lower quality than it is now. Then it got caught in a mass deletion of tagged articles. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 21:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Ah, ok. I see it has been resuscitated now... ħumanUser talk:Human 22:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

The Hum[edit]

Could some reference be made to the the hum phenomenon here? .Not being medical/technical myself, but the auditory version of [1] could apply (some people have 'active sound-hairs' in their ears others do not). (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)