Talk:Islamism

At last

It's about time someone started this. --Danfly (talk) 14:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Islamists or Muslims

Yesterday Godot added a quote referring to Muslims rather than Islammists. Today I did the same. I feel either both should stay or both should go. Proxima Centauri (talk) 18:49, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Your quote was from someone commenting on Muslims. The quote I referenced which was from your article on Pipes, was by an Islimsit. Godot She was a venus demilo in her sister's jeans 18:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Take it out if you like. Proxima Centauri (talk) 18:56, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Daniel Pipes

There already is an article about Daniel Pipes and it's strongly critical. You could of course consider adding to that article. Proxima Centauri (talk) 18:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Then the answer is to remove pipes entirely. It's pretty bad form to talk about someone as "apparently lucid" without giving long running explanations of what you mean especially when you are using him as an expert. If you want an article on pipes, then the comment would make sense, cause you've gone into what you mean by "lucid" and not in his writings. ^{— Unsigned, by: WaitingforGodot / talk / contribs (signed by bot)} 22:09, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

As is, the bit written about Daniel Pipes is currently commented out (i.e. <!-- in comment brackets like this -->). Should we put it back into the article proper? --Luigifan18 (talk) 15:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)