Talk:Larry Sanger

	This Internet related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

This article contains information about one or more living persons. Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats. Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed. If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

The "Delete" tag imma install on this...

Drive-by unreferenced hack job on a living person that isn't really relevant to our mission goals. P-Foster (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Merge to Citizendium - everything in it is actually relevant, particularly the sucking up to academia despite failure therein - David Gerard (talk) 00:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Agree with David Gerard. We could make a section about it in Citizendium and redirect it there. IMO, Sanger is certainly a crank, especially when one considers the mission of Citizendium ("expert" opinions, etc.). Conservative Punk (talk) 01:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Added to relevant section in Citizendium - David Gerard (talk) 01:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Excellent and thank you all. P-Foster (talk) 01:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Better than this?

His pic is captioned as a personal insult against his looks. This is completely meaningless and low effort. If you're going to do articles on people in a serious way, are we really in the business of just calling people ugly as a criticism? BumblingBuffoon (talk) 15:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

I agree. I've changed it. Bongolian (talk) 16:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)