There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Mao Zedong/Archive1
Beginning[edit]
This is a beginning. I'll add more when i have time.Researcher 01:05, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
Removed author's commment from article re intentions as above. Susantalk to me 03:34, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
- Sorry about that. The article is now finished, at least as much as I feel like writing. If people want to add more snark, it would make me happy. (I suck at writing snark, but I lov reading it.)Researcher 21:44, 11 October 2007 (EDT)
- Removed the "under construction" tag, per Researcher's comments.
Mao and Chiang[edit]
I'm all for criticism of Chiang, but this should find its place in a seperate article about that guy. If you put it into the Mao article, it can easily be misunderstood as an attempt to whitewash the latter by presenting Chiang as a foil. Edit: I'm talking specifically about this rant, which'll just prolong the edit war, not criticism in general. Röstigraben (talk) 11:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- I second this motion. Researcher (talk) 04:37, 29 June 2010 (UTC)