Information icon.svg At All things in moderation, we are currently voting on restrictions on the use of LLMs (chatbots) in RationalWiki. Reminder: you need to have at least 75 edits and to have been registered for at least three months to be eligible to vote.

Talk:Minnesota Forward

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Last I checked, WP didn't even have an article on this outfit, which I found odd to say the least. Also, again last I checked, MF didn't even have a web site. (corrected) ħumanUser talk:Human 00:43, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey LX, thanks for creating a whole pile of work integrating your edit with what was already there... damn this place! ħumanUser talk:Human 02:54, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
What are you on about, and why did you revert me? Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 03:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
You mucked up a lot of bits, although added a few good lines. In the end, integrating what you deleted (come on, you removed the quote of their mission!) with what you added was overwhelming, so I undid, but pasted in the "bipartisan" bit. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
The first paragraph read like a quote-mine, so I streamlined it through the use of paraphrasing. I also removed certain ranting that was either demonstrably false or missing the point. We can get into specifics if you prefer. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 04:13, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
The "quote mine" was a "quote". Thanks for helping make it better. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
The WP article needs third-party references, particularly for the "controversy." (Multiple newspaper coverage, ideally.) I'm saying this here rather than there so as not to attract rampant early deletionists - David Gerard (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Exactly. That is why we have an article before they do! — Unsigned, by: Human / talk / contribs (signed by bot) 10:05, 21 August 2010 (UTC)