2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Pioneer Little Europe

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon race.svg

This Race related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

Good idea for a page! Keep at it, I'll see if I have some time to help out later! :) Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

yep, second that. --TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 11:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much for helping with the page, Road. I've got some idea on what else can be added; which is what they've been up to in Montana, and links to both their own site, and news articles describing aforemented Montana antics. Big R (talk) 19:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Lackluster info?[edit]

Hey again. The article is obviously a stub right now, so the thought crossed me if we could derive more info from the references and thus fatten up the later sections of the article. I want to hear thoughts and ideas about this. Of course, more references to derive info from is welcome. Big R (talk) 08:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

new user alleges bias[edit]

Well, the entire premise of the meaning is flawed. Whoever wrote or contributed to this did not do very much research on this at all, saw the name and half-assed an article on it. Also, the "'Little Europe,' whatever that means" line in the article is self-defeating. Saying "they" do anything as a group is misleading and uninformed as it is not a group. How does someone "steal" a digital photo, for that matter? This is one article where I think literally every single line has a flaw, the premise of the article is fundamentally flawed. Everything except the name. "Totally not biased." --Palmer (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

They have an ideological cohesion that makes them an identifiable group. "Stealing" is shorter and less pretentious than "misappropriating". Is that the extent of your criticism? ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 18:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)