There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Two footnotes refer to Amazon sales pages, does RW gain any revenue from possible book sales, and why only Amazon.com and not Amazon.co.uk for example? I think they should be removed as they don't add much. Lily Inspirate me. 15:11, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed? Jack Hughes (talk) 15:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- It's better than "see the Wikipedia article", though. It's certainly worth linking to the books that are mentioned because, you know, people might want to buy them so find out about them, it doesn't matter if RW gets revenue from it. gnostic 15:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)