2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Post-truth

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Better to expound than redirect[edit]

@CheeseburgerFace, @Bigljbigl: Wikipedia has a very detailed page on Post-truth politics. I think it would be better to expound upon the idea rather than simply redirect it to either fake news or emotional appeal. Bongolian (talk) 07:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

I'll try, but it'll probably be one of my infamous stubs. —вιgℓʝвιgℓ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ/sᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
@Bigljbigl OK it's a reasonable start. Thanks! Bongolian (talk) 20:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Added some content with sources. How is it?—HamburgerPlate Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 01:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

The real post-truth[edit]

Is here [1]. Anna Livia (talk) 15:26, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

https://youtu.be/DJl5eTtQ5aQвιgℓʝвιgℓ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ/sᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Huh?[edit]

Is this article really a stub?--Alola, my name is Delibirda! (Chattering place) 09:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@Delibirda No, you’re right it isn’t (anymore). Though you could perhaps argue for adding the expand template(?) ScepticWombat (talk) 15:17, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
@ScepticWombat The article does not miss the important stuff, but could need some expansion.--Alola, my name is Delibirda! (Chattering place) 10:51, 21 January 2020 (UTC)