Talk:Post-truth

Better to expound than redirect

@CheeseburgerFace, @Bigljbigl: Wikipedia has a very detailed page on Post-truth politics. I think it would be better to expound upon the idea rather than simply redirect it to either fake news or emotional appeal. Bongolian (talk) 07:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

I'll try, but it'll probably be one of my infamous stubs. —вιgℓʝвιgℓ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ/sᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

@Bigljbigl OK it's a reasonable start. Thanks! Bongolian (talk) 20:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Added some content with sources. How is it?—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara  (talk • stalk) 01:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

The real post-truth

Is here [1]. Anna Livia (talk) 15:26, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

https://youtu.be/DJl5eTtQ5aQ —вιgℓʝвιgℓ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ/sᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Huh?

Is this article really a stub?--Alola, my name is Delibirda! (Chattering place) 09:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@Delibirda No, you’re right it isn’t (anymore). Though you could perhaps argue for adding the expand template(?) ScepticWombat (talk) 15:17, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@ScepticWombat The article does not miss the important stuff, but could need some expansion.--Alola, my name is Delibirda! (Chattering place) 10:51, 21 January 2020 (UTC)