Talk:Rebecca Brown

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Darn you beat me!! ;) 98.17.57.143

She lost her license, right?[edit]

I suggest dropping the "MD" honorific in the lead.--ZooGuard (talk) 09:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 09:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Milton comparison[edit]

Really--Hastur! (talk) 22:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Credibility[edit]

@Tulkasastaldo44 How Christians view her books isn't really relevant in relation to the truth of her claims. And give the dubious credibility of many of the Satanic Panic proponents, including Brown herself, I for one am not really inclined to care about her books' reception among a community that fell for multiple hoaxes hook, line, and sinker. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 23:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

She actually wrote 15 Christian books and many booklets, three of them are best selling books "Becoming a Vessel of Honor", "Prepare for War" and "He Came to Set the Captives Free". Her books translated to more than 20 other languages. — Unsigned, by: HJA / talk / contribs
Fifty Shades of Grey is a best-selling book and is translated to 52 languages. It doesn't mean it's quality literature. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 00:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Topic[edit]

whoever wrote this article is wrong and totally unacceptable. Please consider this: using someone's name for your own interest is totally held you to be accountable. Dr. Rebecca Brown is a true christian follower, loved and respected by countless people all over the world. The content in this article is totally unrelated to her identity. Because you have a different perspective | believe doesn't mean will give you a right to feed wrong information to the public. Public deserves a right information. — Unsigned, by: LAISH / talk / contribs

That's not how this works. Whether she's loved or not is irrelevant to the veracity of her claims. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC):
AS WE SAID EARLIER PUBLIC DESERVES THE RIGHT INFORMATION! AND WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT THIS WILL BE CORRECTED WHITHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT. — Unsigned, by: LAISH / talk / contribs
Who is we? Also, perhaps calm down and discuss this like adults? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)