From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


[[Image:colorful flag.png|thumb|Part of the [[human sexuality]] series]]?

The flag is associated, to my knowledge, with a particular deviation from human sexuality. HeartGold tx 00:29, 11 July 2007 (CDT)

Actually, it is associated with acceptance of all aspects of human sexuality. As our resident expert on gay bars, you should know that! A "deviation from human sexuality" would mean what, exactly? humanbe in 00:33, 11 July 2007 (CDT)

It may be considered a deviation from normal sexuality as its practitioners are small in number, or for the fact that its sexual behaviors do not have a possibility of producing offspring (the natural purpose for SEX) — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

Why "human"?[edit]

Why did we need to specify that it's about human sexuality? Were we afraid people would think we were talking about canine or waterfowl sexuality? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:05, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

Yes? ħumanUser talk:Human 23:31, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


Why no reference to this aspect? (with mention of Marx/Engels money-fetishism, and WP neutrality-fetishism)?

Fetishism - interest in any 'thing' that you are not into (just as an alcoholic is 'someone who drinks more than their doctor) and out of which the self-proclaimed mental analysts can get kudos by writing about. (talk) 18:19, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh god[edit]

This entire section of the wiki is an embarrassment. I'm not sure how to deal with it except a total rebuilding from the bottom up. Blue (is useful) 06:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Err... have fun? Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 06:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Have at. Тysic semper 14:03, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
I can't say I've paid too much attention to it. Scarlet A.pngd hominem 14:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)