Talk:Shawn Baker
Name calling[edit]
My first time looking at a “Rationalwiki” article and now I know why I’ve never before. It’s petulant and adolescent name calling like this article that must have been written by a 13 year old. This is not a serious forum for discussion just a scream chamber. — Unsigned, by: 73.55.181.5 / talk
- Tone argument, appeal to gravity... Incorrect given there's no actual insults or jabs in the article. Do you have anything of any real substance to add to the conversation? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Reads like an Ad Hominem attack[edit]
"dangerous all-meat diet" "stupid anti-scientific" — Unsigned, by: 24.185.216.204 / talk
- An ad hominem is when someone dismisses the opponent's argument by insulting the opponent's character. These aren't dismissals of Baker's arguments, they're addressing his arguments while not being afraid to call out the stupidity of those arguments. The tone argument is also equally fallacious, which is what you're doing here. Carthage (talk) 17:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Only one mistake[edit]
This article was recently reviewed [1] by Lifting Vegan Logic. There was only one mistake on the article which I have corrected. In total this article is very good work and an accurate expose of Shawn Baker. 143.110.172.189 (talk) 23:55, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is biased[edit]
I work as a food scientist and this article is biased. Shawn Baker and myself have been doing carnivore for over 5 years but neither of us have had a heart attack. I operate over 40 food labs. I am actually a scientist yet RationalWiki is attacking carnivores. There is vegan bias on this website. Marilern1987 (talk) 11:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Importantly, what's your stance on birthday cakes? Chillpilled (talk) 11:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Obvious troll is obvious lol, claims to be 35 yet operates over 40 food labs. Also general vague "food scientist" claim. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)