User talk:Lavalizard101

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Lavalizard101! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Christopher (talk) 16:07, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Are you

wp:User:Lavalizard101, who recently got unblocked on Wikipedia? --Gale5050 (talk) 00:22, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Yes I am. Lavalizard101 (talk) 01:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Notification

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound POWER — and these external tools:

• Google Scholar Button ^{(Chrome, Firefox)} searches your highlighted text in Google Scholar. Easily check academic citations!
• web.archive.org and archive.today, among other tools, can save permanent copies of webpages. Never lose a crank website or racist Tweet ever again! --Gale5050 (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Sysop

Message from the RationalWiki Ministry of Demotion and Personal Impediment Dear Lavalizard101, We are gently informing you about how we have demoted you to the rank of sysop. You have received a mop and bucket to clean up messes here. No questions are allowed here. If you have any further inquiries, please refer to the enclosed pamphlet So you are now a sysop. At your leisure, please go to the dungeon Room 202 to see the reward mops and hammers you can work towards having! Sincerely,

Carthage (talk) 13:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for giving my autopatrolled, but since I'm not sure what reaction my latest edits will get, I've rolled them back. Are you able to advise me which of today's edits can be allowed to stand please? Thanks. --William on Discs (talk) 19:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

They both look fine to me. Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you once again, I've restored them. --William on Discs (talk) 20:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Swimming naked in school

Hi there, I noticed this draft article in NPP, and I'd like to ask if this is a missional topic? I don't see how it's on mission, it's about the history of school PE, which isn't something that is related to this wiki, given that it focuses mostly on covering the sciences and in particular exposing cranks and conmen. Thanks. --William on Discs (talk) 20:31, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Yeah it was off-mission I've deleted it now. Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

FYI, we don't like putting links in headers. We have Template:Main for section-defining links. --Luigifan18 (talk) 20:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

We may owe ObserverOfTruth an apology.

Hey, I noticed that you blocked a new user named ObserverOfTruth on… somewhat shaky reasoning, and @Rairyu75 unblocked them while telling you off. While I get where you were coming from (Badger's Law being a thing and all), I have to agree with Rairyu. When I still had my mop, I was told off a few times for preemptively blocking users on flimsy suspicions. That sort of thing could scare off potential good-faith editors. Now, I was going to put a remark on ObserverOfTruth's talk page explaining all this and apologizing for the frosty welcome, but I'm not entirely sure how well that would go. What do you think? --Luigifan18 (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

They haven't done anything, you don't need to do that. You've gotten in trouble for posting misleading things on new user's talkpages, so you should know better. As for Lavalizard,

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Somebody just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Plutocow (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

All things in moderation

A case involving you has been raised at All things in moderation. Feel free to comment. Don't take this too seriously, but you just did something silly. GeeJayK^{Where all evil dwells} _{Where every lie is true} 11:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Greetings, Lavalizard101.

Might I ask you to go a bit easier on the 𝝅 x infinity blocks? As per the RationalWiki:Blocking policy "Whitewashing pages" only warrants a short term block. Thank you. - Rairyu75 (Talk) 13:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Simon Webb

That random user's acts of vandalism on Simon Webb's article are linked to Webb's video responding to his own article on this site: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WEoey2LFMk&t=131s DaRealPrinceZuko (talk) 22:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Why did you delete my Draft page on Brian Roemmele?

It was far from complete. ^{— Unsigned, by: Nysus / talk / contribs}

From the search I performed Brian Roemmele was at best just a run of the mill crank. We do not have articles on every run of the mill crank. That and the draft was semi-advertorial "Are you in search of ... look no further". Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks For the autopatroll

Qwertydiy (talk) 11:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

I don't quite get why Skibidibiden is an unacceptable username

I saw that the 'Skibidibiden' account was blocked today after coming across CircularReasoning's old 'Vandalizing Conservapedia' page, and I don't quite get how that's a disruptive username? It's making reference to a Stephen Colbert skit, so nothing really stands out to me as offensive or something like that; Is it because of Skibidi Toilet's creator having some shit opinions about stuff like Russia? TheOneAndOnlyCirrusMan (talk) 23:42, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Its bc skibidi in usernames tend to be used by vandals and disruptive editors over at nearly all wikis and fandoms, I have yet to come across a wiki where skibidi in the username has not ended in the user being a vandal, heck Wikipedia has added it to the username flag filter bc of it. Lavalizard101 (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

I was not aware of this, thank you for clarifying. TheOneAndOnlyCirrusMan (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Tyler Michael Mannix

Did they need to be blocked indefinitely for "mindless vandalism"? I'd agree with blocking them temporarily for whitewashing and possibly spam, however, looking at the blocking policy and their contributions, I didn't really see any vandalism, just them trying to hijack articles. Tavantius (talk) 13:01, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Their editing was Right Wing Nutjob trolling, calling Disney and other studios satanic and demonic etc and claiming the world hates christians etc. I've never seen reason to stagger blocks (except for IPs) for obvious "NOTHERE" behaviour. Now if it were smaller vandalistic edits that could be ascribed to editing tests then yeah I stagger blocks or vandal bin to help them learn. But we shouldn't put up with "vandalism-only accounts" and just temp block them, no other Wiki/Wikia/Fandom does. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

All things in moderation

A case involving you has been raised at All things in moderation. Feel free to comment.Plutocow (talk) 21:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)