Talk:Steven Seagal
|
This United States politics related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information. |
| ||
|
| ||||
|
This article contains information about one or more living persons. Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats. |
[edit]
The existence of this great article reminds me of the need I think we've had for some time to get some kind of "mall ninja/martial arts woo/broscience/basement dweller SWAT tactics/soldier of fortune-reader/knockoff katana vs milk jug"-nav. We have more than a few articles we could apply it too, starting with this one. Thoughts? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:46, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Again thanks for your positive appraisal, I really appreciate it. Could you list a few examples of articles which would apply? I would be interested in adding a navbar because the article looks so empty without one. ∈ NameThatNobodyTakes (✎) 11:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- You earned it, buddy. I'm actually hoping FCP will pick up on the suggestion to make us what is essentially a machismo nav. Paramilitary woo, McDojos... It'd fit perfectly for Steven Seagal as well. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Why the sup-parenthetical citations?[edit]
They're confusing for people who don't know how the refs are set up. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 01:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- I thought it was a comprimise for people who wouldn't want to watch specific video bits just for the soundbites. I got the idea when I read another article on here (forgot which one though) which referenced the same PDF multiple times but wrote the page number in sup tags next to the ref link. However I understand the concern that a reader first needs to figure out what is meant by them (which is not the case for page numbers). Give me some time I'm going to change it in my next update. ∈ NameThatNobodyTakes (✎) 16:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Great article[edit]
Just stumbled upon this, and highly enjoyed it. IveBeenFrank (talk) 01:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Recommend watching this[edit]
LeucippusSalva veritate 17:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)